Aquiles
Aquiles — auditable, host-directed antiviral target triage for Aedes arboviruses What we built.
Core trick
A verifier agent re-reads each cited claim against raw database records in an isolated context, and only confirmed evidence reaches synthesis while scores are computed in code.
Description
Aquiles — auditable, host-directed antiviral target triage for Aedes arboviruses
What we built. Dengue, Zika and chikungunya have no approved antiviral — and because
they mutate fast, drugs that hit the virus directly lose to resistance. Aquiles takes
the opposite route: it looks for the human proteins the virus hijacks to replicate —
the machinery it can't live without — and ranks which of those host factors are both
essential to the virus and druggable. A drug that targets your own protein is far
harder for the virus to escape, and can potentially work across all three arboviruses
at once.
For each host-factor gene, three Claude agents work in sequence: a specialist (Haiku
4.5) gathers cited evidence from public biomedical databases (Open Targets, DGIdb,
Europe PMC) plus the Krogan host–pathogen interactome and published CRISPR
host-dependency screens, and makes concrete, checkable claims. An independent verifier
(Sonnet) then re-reads every claim in an isolated context, against the raw database
record — marking each one confirmed, corrected, or unsupported. Only verified evidence
flows into a final synthesis agent that writes a go / watch / no-go dossier and,
where an approved drug already exists, a repurposing hypothesis. Druggability and
evidence-strength scores are computed in code from verified claims — never written by
the model. The whole pipeline is exposed as an MCP server, and a web app lets a
scientist ask in plain language and watch the verification happen live.
What we found. The independent verifier caught [52 of 79 — 66%] of the specialist's
own claims as unsupported or wrong — mistakes a self-checking AI would have delivered
as fact. That is the core result: in biomedical AI, the reviewer is usually the same
model with the same blind spots, and separating the verifier into its own agent with
its own context measurably changes the output.
Why it matters. The bottleneck for trusting AI in the life sciences isn't generating
hypotheses — it's knowing which ones to believe. Aquiles turns an antiviral discovery
question into an auditable one: every number traces back to a public source that
survived independent verification, and a human stays in the loop on every dossier.
It's a template for AI-assisted drug discovery you can actually check — applied to a
disease burden that hit 6M+ cases in Brazil alone in 2024, with no cure on the shelf.
README excerpt
# Aquiles **Auditable host-directed antiviral target triage for arboviruses — with an *independent* verifier.** Built for **Built with Claude: Life Sciences** (Anthropic + Gladstone Institutes), Builder track. --- ## The problem Aedes-borne arboviruses — dengue, Zika, chikungunya, yellow fever — have **no approved antiviral**. Host-directed therapy (drugging the *human* proteins the virus depends on) is the leading strategy, and Gladstone-style interactomics (Krogan's Dengue/Zika host–pathogen maps) and CRISPR screens yield hundreds of candidate host factors. Turning that list into *"which targets are worth pursuing, are druggable, and why did prior antivirals fail?"* is manual and takes days. ## What Aquiles does For each candidate host-factor gene, an orchestrated pipeline: 1. **Specialist** (Claude Haiku) gathers cited evidence from **Open Targets, DGIdb, and Europe PMC** and makes concrete, checkable claims (druggability, known drugs, safety, prior evidence, role). 2. **Independent verifier** (Claude Sonnet) checks **every claim, in an isolated context, against the raw database record** — confirm / correct / unsupported. It never sees the rest of the reasoning, so its judgement is ground-truth-anchored, not the same model reviewing itself. 3. **Synthesis** produces a calibrated, auditable **go / watch / no-go dossier** with a mechanistic hypothesis, a suggested validation experiment, and the likely reason prior repurposing trials failed. The numbers (